The Functions of Diplomacy Essay

slightness has existed since the beginning of the hu cosmos race. The act of conducting duologues surrounded by cardinal persons, or two nations at a large scope is essential to the upkeep of worldwideist personal matters. Among the many functions of fleececy, some include interrupting war and violence, and fortifying transaction between two nations. delicacy is most importantly employ to complete a limited agenda. Therefore without fragility, much of the worlds affairs would be abolished, inter interior(a) organizations would not exist, and above all the world would be at a constant present of war. It is for daintiness that certain countries move exist in harmony. There has not been a documented start of fineness withal there invite been instances ranging anchor to the 5th century where diplomacy arose in certain nations. Dating back to 432 B.C, the Congress of Sparta was an illustration of diplomacy as organized by the Greek City States (Nicolson 1). The orig in of the word diploma comes from different sides of the earth. In Greece diploma meant folded in two, while in Ancient Rome the word was used to describe travel documents. oftenmultiplication times the word diplomacy is given many meanings.Many times will the words indemnity and the word negotiation be seen as synonyms hence the word diplomacy and foreign diplomacy ar deemed to be similar (Nicolson 3). These synonyms of diplomacy be all faulty. While they may be very similar in some cases, they are not the just now the same. Sir Harold Nicolson who was an English Diplomat born in Tehran, Persia, states that Diplomacy is neither the innovation nor the pastime of some particular political system, but is an essential grammatical constituent in any reason fitted relation between man and man and between nation and nation (Nicolson 4). For the upkeep of the International System, diplomacy is used in every corner of the world. Without it many nations would not be open to conduct s uccessful negotiations. While many are not able to have a clear beginning or creation of diplomacy, innovative diplomacy has bugger off much more advanced and many aspects have changed over the geezerhood. The Peace of Westphalia in 1648 created the first new-fangled diplomatical telling in addition to creating a new world order in central europium based on state sovereignty.Much of Europe began to change after the introduction of modern diplomacy. For example, France under Cardinal Richelieu introduced the modern approachto foreign traffic, based on the nation-state and motivated by national interest as its ultimate purpose (Kissinger 17). The saucy World tack together began to bloom in all of Central and Western Europe. Great Britain coped for the vestibular sense of power which kept European diplomacy alive for the next two hundred years (Kissinger 17). Every province in Europe contributed a micro to the diplomacy the world has today. The balance of powers theory that many famous realists such(prenominal) as Francsesco Sforza, Machiavelli, and Guiciardini argued was and still is an essential comp whiznt of modern diplomacy. Many could argue that diplomacy is a product of society and history itself. As countries continue different aspects are added to diplomacy. Separation of powers, national interest, and a countrys sovereignty are only a few instalments that were added to modern diplomatic history. Therefore, diplomacy can be seen as an ever-changing plan, the same substance International Relations between countries fluctuate.Author of The Pure Concept of Diplomacy Jos Calvet De Magalhes stated that continuity of the diplomatic launching throughout thousands of years and in all known civilizations shows that diplomacy is an institution inherent to planetary life itself, one that may undergo transformations or may be used with more or less intensity, but cannot be give with (Szykman). As Henry Kissinger states By pursuing its own se lfish interests, all(prenominal) state is presumed to contribute to progress, as if some unseen hand were guaranteeing that emancipation of choice for eac state assured surface-being for all (Kissinger 22), In the cart track of all diplomatic history no country has influenced international relations as decisively and at the same time as ambivalently as the united States. No society, has more firmly insisted on the inadmissibility of intervention in the domestic affairs of early(a) states, or more passionately take a firm stand that its own values were universally applicable. No nation has been more matter-of-fact in the day-to-day conduct of its diplomacy, or more ideological in the pursuit of its history moral convictions.No country has been more averse to engage itself abroad level while undertaking alliances and commitments of unprecedented top and scope (Kissinger 18). The United States headstrong tendencies to succeed have made it one of the most influential countri es in the course of diplomacy. The most famous of all peace proposals following World War I was the program of cardinal Points, delivered by President Woodrow Wilson in1918 (Szykman). Most can argue that without the United States, much of modern diplomacy would be gone. There are in fact many functions of diplomacy that make diplomacy an essential divisor for any peaceful and efficient change. The reason to negotiate with other persons has unceasingly been the same, to have better relations. Over the course of diplomacy being in existence, the structure of diplomatic posts has changed from a loose one to an organized institution made for a specific purpose.While the structure of diplomatic posts has changed, the functions perpetually remained the same. There are four functions of diplomacy. The first function involves representing a states interests and conducting negotiations or discussions designed to identify unwashed interests as well as areas of disagreement between the pa rties, for the purpose of achieving the states goals and avoiding date (Ameri 1). Representations of a state as well as negotiation are the most important functions of diplomacy. Negotiations between two representatives are a observe component in diplomacy, because in doing so the representatives find a common interest. Finding a common interest is vital in conducting negotiations because with a common interest representatives are able to devise a event that is in the interest of both sides. G.R. Berridge that negotiation can produce the advantages available from the cooperative pursuit of common interests and it is only this activity that can prevent violence from being employed to settle remaining arguments over self-contradictory ones (Berridge 1).The second function of diplomacy involves the gathering of information and subsequent appointment and evaluation of the receiving states foreign constitution goals (Ameri 1). Diplomatic posts are concerned with gathering informat ion however when the information is sent back to their native country a Foreign Ministry analyzes the data and determines what foreign policy should be enacted. Political leaders choose what path is right for their country then. The third major function of diplomacy is expansion of political, economic, and cultural ties between two countries (Ameri 2). For example, after WWII countries such as the United States and Britain aimed their foreign policy at the extermination of communism. In present day, the United States State section engages international audiences to speak about politics, security, and their values to help create an environs receptive to US national interests. In addition, the State subdivision p.a. sponsors more than 40,000educational and cultural exchanges (Diplomacy).Finally, the fourth function of diplomacy is that diplomacy is the facilitating or enforcing vehicle for the observation of international law (Ameri 2). It is the diplomats job to promote the countr ys national interests and keep ties with other countries open. The emphasis put on diplomacy is not just preponderant in todays world, however it was a developing concept in the Renaissance as well. Great thinkers such as Machiavelli, Guicciardini, Grotius, Richelieu, Wicquefort, Satow, Nicolson, and Kissinger had a profound impact on diplomacy. For Machiavelli diplomacy was a tool of prevarication to grant more power to the state (Beridge 24). Machiavellis impact on leaders was a major one because he argued for leaders to be headstrong as well as reserved. Guicciardini promoted the upkeep of good relations to be careful with whom one deals with and that reputation is key in a negotiation (Berridge 43). His contribution to diplomacy was that diplomatic posts are given to the great unwashed who can be trusted and can promote their countrys state interests. What these great thinkers contributed to diplomacy was immense. All of them contributed a different element to the ever-growing concept of diplomacy.Since the subject of diplomacy is always growing and changing, it can be said that because of its vast effect on the world, everybody needs diplomacy to survive. It has become such a vital part of everyones life that is indirectly becoming a trait for survival. Throughout the course of history diplomacy has been a paramount element in the upkeep of peace and in the creation of positive change. Without diplomacy much of the worlds affairs would not exist. There are many examples of how diplomacy has affected countries, and even individual citizens. An example of how negotiation positively can affect mortal is Clintons negotiation with Kim Jung Il in North Korea. Their peaceful negotiation resulted in the release of two American citizens. An example of how power can corrupt diplomacy is Libya and Switzerland.With the introduction of power, in other words oil, countries such as Libya with the leader Ghaddafi are able to have a stronger mien in the world and say things that can normally not be said. Power corrupts, however diplomacy seeks to rid corruption and reinforce the international system as well as international law. It is for diplomacy that international organizations can exist. In a diplomatic way, an international organization is only a manymembers finding a common ground on a particular subject. In the United Nations for example, all the members try to find a common interest for positive change. Although it is sometimes perceived to be slow change, the method of diplomacy causes fewer casualties than any other one. If diplomacy were not in existence, international organizations would not exist. The world would be at a constant state of war, and war would in fact never end because they normally end with diplomatic negotiations.Selected BibliographyAdam, Watson,. Diplomacy the dialogue between states. New York McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1983. Berridge, G. R. Diplomatic Theory From Machievelli to Kissinger. New York Palgrave, 2001. Dipl omacy The U.S. Department of State at Work. U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Public Affairs, June 2008. Web. 2 Sept. 2009. . Eban, Abba Solomon. New diplomacy international affairs in the modern age. New York hit-or-miss House, 1983. Kissinger, Henry. Diplomacy (A Touchstone Book). New York Simon & Schuster, 1995. Kwong, Maj Tang Mun. The Roles of Diplomacy and Deterrence in the 21 st Century. Journal V27 N1 Jan-Mar (2001). Newsom, David D. Diplomacy under a Foreign glad When Nations break Relations. Washington DC Institute for the Study of Diplomacy,1991. Nicolson, Harold. Diplomacy. Oxford Oxford University Press, 1977. Satow, Ernest M. A pathfinder to diplomatic practice. London Longmans, 1932. Written by Christopher Amacker