Animal testing Essay

creature larnking is used for many a nonher(prenominal) products worldwide. similarly fauna examen is used for a wide range of things, such as items in houses and medicines. Many built in beds test on beasts, such as confidential facilities, universities, and government laboratories. A big debate in to spatial relationreal days society is whether or not scientist should use sentient beings for examination. just about of the brutes function during or after the scrutiny. Typing animal scrutiny on images on the mesh it is both(prenominal) likely that gruesome images of coneys, mice, cats, and dogs harmoniumism used as test subjects will appear. rough mint mean that animal interrogatory has improve the world and continues to do so. They look, at the good side of what animal testing has f whole aparte for military man. people want to accomplish sure that the product that they be using is salutary and wont affect them in a negative way. closely the gre at unwashed gestate that it is fine as big as the animal is put to sleep while being well-tried on and if the animals feel no pain thence it doesnt enume crop that they ar being well-tried on. Most pack cerebrate that since around commonwealth eat animals why not use them for testing, which can fight backer macrocosm. but separate hatful think that there be infract ways to conduct these experiments. These people cant stand the occurrence that millions of animals die because of testing. Haugen, David wildcat ExperimentationA lot of animal testing is used for cosmetics. Items such as mascara and shaving cream atomic number 18 commonplace cosmetics. The much or less used animals for animal testing are rabbits, guinea pigs, and mice or rats. It is important for some people to know that their cosmetics were not used to vituperate animals. However, former(a)(a) people say that they would rather ca-ca their products tested by animals because they would rather be safe and to pee sure that they wont be affected by the product in a negative way. other main(prenominal) cause for animal testing is for aesculapian query. Medical research has jocked technology. Scientist, want to make sure that they are testing with the more or less trus twainrthy technology and at this moment its animals. The study of animals helps scientist understand better. Ways that Animal testing has helped medial research is that it has helped find a cure for doorknocker cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, and many others.Now years it seems not ethical for humans to be tested on, but in the late(prenominal)people in psychological hospitals or prisons adopt been used as guinea pigs. In the past this behavior was accept sufficient. earthly concern that are tested subjects these days are able to verbalize up for themselves where animals are not capable of that. Most people that agree with animal testing substantiate never been forced to do something that they did nt build a say ab break through and didnt arrest rights. Darwin has showed that we share a common lineage with other animals, and a posterior genetic research has shown the closeness of evolutionary links. This means that we are genuinely similar to animal. Boines, The use of curari in a repository medium in the management of acute poliomyelitis.Most of the animals that are from the streets or animal shelters that are being used as test subjects. Scientists believe that if the animal is discharge to no use, then it should be used for testing. rough laboratories hire people to drive around to find animals on the street. Most people dupet believe that this is right because that animal could be some atomic number 53s lost loving pet. In the past there beat been cases of animals being stolen for testing and even trades happening for testing. Jmett, The student roos Animal testing has decreased. The main cause of it decreasing is that people have be roll in the hay more cognizan t of it and what the side effects are to animals. Also a lot of people sp complete most of their epoch protesting against it and devising other people advised of it. The push of stopping animal testing has affected businesses. For example cosmetic, companies have lost customers because the customers that believe that animal testing isnt ethical slangt want to steal their products from a business that test on animals. This has pushed many large cosmetic companies to quit animal testing, but some of them wear downt tell the complete truth. People have implant that companies that say they are animal testing isolated usually have other companies test their products on animals for them. They can get away with having the other company willing to test for them because the companies that sell animal tested free products can get away with double or tripling the factual value because they know that customers want to see the words of animal tested free and then the company will share the profit with the other company that tested the products on the animals for them. n.p, A Critical Evaluation of Animal questionPeople read articles and the description of how they actually test the animal and it shocks them and they think that animal testing should be banned forever, but most of these people as well go int realize that animal testing has helped us with our medical research. Most people that have been sick or are close to someone that is seriously ill and animal testing is one of their only hopes for getting better then they all of a sudden are all for animal testing.A big dubiety is, is animal testing worth it? somewhat people say no because more than half of the animals end up demise after testing. And the testing is usually for the humans and their bodies can react different than the animals, so most people believe that testing isnt even worth it. The other side of the people believes that testing is worth it because even though animals die there is still progress in todays medical research. The more that animals get tested on the more we come side by side(predicate) to a better society. They believe that scientists need to start with something and that something is testing on animals. Botting, The history of thalidomide. Drug News & Perspectives, Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. pabulum and chemical Toxicology, 40There have been multiple cases where animal testing has affected animals differently than it affected the humans. When cigarettes first came out, they tested them by animals to see if they were safe. If they went by safe what animal testing showed about cigarettes, it would be wrong. For animals to enliven cigarette smoke is okay and it wont revile them, where it would harm humans. Cigarettes also didnt cause cancer in animals, which they actually do in humans. This shows that cancer is different for animals and humans. Another example is the do drugs Thalidomide, which was to he lp prevent nausea and morning sickness for pregnant mothers. Thalidomide was tested on many animals and all of the animals showed the drug as being safe and okay. The drug ended up being unsafe, which caused babies to be born with deformities. The main dent from this drug caused flipper limbs. This was when the legs and arms were really short and were joined at the hip and shoulder joints. The reason that all of the animals showed this drug to be safe was because the drug was not correctly tested. To becorrectly tested they would have had to test the drug on pregnant animals to show accurate results, which shows other way that animal testing isnt always effective and doesnt always show the most accurate results. This is just two out of countless documents where animal testing failed to work. All the products were initially tested on animals and were thought to be safe for humans, but when given to humans, major consequences took place leading to deceases and deformities. Animal te sting was disproven to be accurate in these tests. This leads people to believe that animal testing is not safe and that people shouldnt always trust that animal testing would be accurate. Allanou, Public accessibility of data on EU lofty production volume chemicals. Some people believe that animal testing has slowed the process of medicine. They believe this because they think that scientists waste measure by testing on the animals. They could waste time because some animals react different then humans and most animals end up dying. Others believe that it is worth the time and that great things can come out of animal testing, which is very true. Humans should be very glad for what scientist have accomplished. Because of animal testing, scientists have been able to create medicines, vaccines, and insulin that can cure humans. Animal testing has also helped physicians. Animal testing has helped them by making it more accurate for them to do surgeries, such as heart and lung surg eries. interrogatory has allowed doctors and scientists save many lives. Animal research has played a resilient rise in virtually every major medical parent of the last century for both human and veterinary health. From antibiotics to blood transfusions, from dialysis to organ transplantation, from vaccinations to chemotherapy, bypass surgery and join replacement, practically every present day protocol for the prevention, treatment, cure and control of disease, pain and suffering is based on knowledge attained through research with lab animals. The Foundation for biomedical Research. This makes people believe that if animal testing were to slow down then advancements in modern medicine would significantly slow down.There are about 450 ways to replace animal testing. For some reason many people believe that animal testing is the only option, but that its wrong. The reason we havent completely stopped testing on animals is because itwould speak to a lot of money to replace it, bu t in the presbyopic run it would probably save us money. Also, animals are easier to obtain in labs because scientist are so used to working with them. Its easy to withhold their day-to-day habits alternatively of changing their whole research and starting over. Also people see that animals die everyday from being tested and they couldnt imagine seeing humans die occasionally from being experimented with. The rate that society is going, animal testing will always happen, but as time goes by it will be improved and become more humane.Some people believe that animals do not feel pain. Scientists strickle though that they do feel pain. An animal has a vertebra back tog out just like humans, which leads scientist to believe that they have the alike(p) nerves as us. This means that the animals capacity feel the same or similar to what we feel. Some scientists do believe that if the animal is in intense shock from the testing it wont feel any pain. This information makes people wit ting of the effects of animal testing. Some people urge and say that instead of testing on animals test on humans because animals have no say in what happens to them as where humans have a vocalization and can speak up for themselves. The other side of the inclination is that a humans life is more valuable than an animals. Humans are more advanced than an animal, which leads people to feel more tender-hearted about the human.Crawford The schizophrenic career of a monster drugSome people view animals as equals to humans. The common thing that most people think is that humans are on a higher direct than animals because humans have control over their lives and more characteristics, such as humans are more intelligent, creative, aware, technologically advanced, able to understand and speak an language, and able to make moral choices. These rights are what lead people to believe that humans are higher than animals, but the other side of the argument can prove this wrong in their own way. The other side of the argument says that since animals can feel pain they are the same evenly as humans. People dont think that humans and animals should be separated into different groups because they both suffer and can both die. People also point out that not all humans are capable of having all the characteristics that a normal human would have, such as infants orhandicapped humans. These people that have less characteristics sometimes might even have less than an animal so an animal would be higher on fountain. Also since infants dont have high levels of characteristics many Americans believe that they should be given equal power, which is the same power as a grown adult. They think this is right because their parents value them. But then that doesnt work for pets if a human values them. This is very inconsistent it shows that life isnt fair at times. But to be fair everything that is valued by an adult should have rights not just one half.One of the biggest issues that people use to defend animal testing is that the animals are going to die eventually anyway. They say that in temperament animals would end up killing each other or dying of natural causes. This is very true, but the other side can argue and say that the way the animals are getting tested on is not natural. The animals end up dying, but a painful death that wasnt planned to happen. Some humans torture other humans without their consent such as rape and that it is looked down upon and is not pleasant in our society. Also people for animal testing say humans hunt the animals and kill them to eat, which is true. The other side states that its not the same because hunting is for a benefit to survive. They understand that animal testing could be for our benefit for example it can be good for medical research. even up though it can be safe, it still is different than hunting because animal testing can be a painful process for the animal and not every company uses it for benefits. Lyon Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking, monographs on the rating of carcinogenic risks to humans. International Agency for Research on CancerMost people are unaware that animal testing is actually beneficial to animals themselves. Animals need to have the best nutrient and if anyone has an animal as a pet more than likely the animal isnt going to go out and hunt for its food in the wild, which would make sure it got all of its necessary diet. So to make sure the pet has the best nutrition it has to get all of it in its dog food that people buy at the store for them. To make sure all of the right nutrients is in the dog food and wont harm the animal scientists have to test the product on animals to get the best result. Scientists have also used animals for testing on worms, which is amedical problem for animals and have come up with a result that helps pets lives. Most people agree that this is right because it is actually benefiting the animals and their lives werent just a waste.I believe that animal testing isnt ethical. I am an animal lover, but its not just that. I resist in what takes place in the labs. I believe that humans and animals are equally on the same level. So when you see an animal fix up in a tight, small cage think to yourself what if they were one of your friends or a family member? These animals never get affection so I imagine what life would be like growing up as a child with no one there to support me or lead the way for me. Animal testing has been around for eld and people are just now realizing that it is harmful.I also dont believe that animal testing is accurate. Rabbits look are different than ours. Rabbits feel more pain in their eye than humans and the pain effects them longer and it takes a long time for the substance that we put in their eyes to go away. A rabbits eye is ten times more reactant to hydraulic upshot than our eyes. After the rabbits are tested on scientists wait 14 days until they clean the solution out of th eir eyes. Whenever Im in the exhibitor and I get shampoo in my eyes I make sure that I clean them out right away, which is normal they shouldnt have to have solution sitting in their eyes for two weeks when us humans cant even stand it for a minute. The rabbits are extremely affected by this test. The chemical causes swollen eyes, irritated and hidden eyes, and inflamed skin around the eyes. Also they might endure ulcers, bleeding, or blindness. Once the test are finished the rabbits die.I believe most cosmetic companies are frauds. They say they are doing animal testing to make sure that the products are safe and that they care about their customers. In worldly concern they just perform the animal testing so any customers dont sue them. Many cosmetic companies say that the law requires them to perform test on animals to make sure their products are safe, but the companies dont make that a law. So millions of animals suffer and die for stingy companies not wanting to get sued by their customers. I also believe that in the past when new products were firstcoming out it was okay because we didnt even know how these products would affect anything. In general I think every cosmetic companies knows whats right and wrong for their customers. whole works CitedHansen, Allanou R. Public availibility of data on EU high productions volume chemicals. N.p. Jont Research center, 1009. Print.American Practice. Boines, 3 May 2010. Web. 12 Oct. 2012.James, Botting J. The History of thalomide. N.p. Food and Chemical Toxicoigy, 1991. Print. Lane, Crawford C. The schizophrenic carrer of a monster drug. N.p. Pediatrics, 1993. Print.